> Your perception is incorrect. > I am still maintaining iproute2. Phil is just providing lots of feedback > and new patches. No offense intendet! I know, Phil has already clarified things in the other responses. Maybe you overlooked those accidentally.
> The size of the change makes it harder to digest, and I do think > adding JSON support is a good idea. Just concerned about the long > term maintainance overhead. Plus I want the other utilities to have > JSON output as well. Therefore this change is going to take longer > to adopt and hopefull we can figure out a good way to do this kind > of output. I see! Well, do you conceive a decentralized approach or a centralized one for all the utilities? Decentralizied would be as things are now – I mean what my patch series tries to amount to. > Almost want to go to C++ or something. Would that be viable or is that a wishful line of thougts?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
