On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:57:28PM +0100, Matthias Tafelmeier wrote: > >> Those resentments were related to the patchsets complexity and > >> size. > > > > I didn't see any problem with that in the first place. It is indeed > > a big change, achieving something like that without a big patch set > > is unlikely. > > > > Fine, I was just repounding that since Steven Hemminger raised that. > My reasoning here is that I just don't want to kick off restarting > work whith objections still in the minds – since we are already at V7 > now.
Yeah, sorry for not having looked into this earlier. Also, I neither have nor claim any power of veto. Apart from that, I'm not against this patch series in general, just trying to help raise it's quality a bit. Eventually, we don't set anything in stone so everything can be fixed/improved later on. Except Git history of course, which is important to get right in relation to bisecting. Cheers, Phil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
