Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 08:00:40PM CEST, [email protected] wrote:
<snip>
>> diff --git a/include/net/switchdev.h b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> index e11425e..a79a7f0 100644
>> --- a/include/net/switchdev.h
>> +++ b/include/net/switchdev.h
>> @@ -64,15 +64,23 @@ enum switchdev_obj_id {
>> SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_FDB,
>> };
>>
>> +struct switchdev_obj {
>> +};
>> +
>> /* SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN */
>> struct switchdev_obj_vlan {
>> + struct switchdev_obj obj;
>> u16 flags;
>> u16 vid_begin;
>> u16 vid_end;
>> };
>>
>> +#define SWITCHDEV_OBJ_VLAN(obj) \
>> + container_of(obj, struct switchdev_obj_vlan, obj)
>> +
>> /* SWITCHDEV_OBJ_IPV4_FIB */
>> struct switchdev_obj_ipv4_fib {
>> + struct switchdev_obj obj;
>> u32 dst;
>> int dst_len;
>> struct fib_info *fi;
>> @@ -82,18 +90,27 @@ struct switchdev_obj_ipv4_fib {
>> u32 tb_id;
>> };
>>
>> +#define SWITCHDEV_OBJ_IPV4_FIB(obj) \
>> + container_of(obj, struct switchdev_obj_ipv4_fib, obj)
>
>Isn't there a collision to have a SWITCHDEV_OBJ_IPV4_FIB enum and a
>SWITCHDEV_OBJ_IPV4_FIB macro?
>
>Maybe switchdev will support not only port-objects, but also switch chip
>objects, so would it be good to make the distinction between them? e.g.:
>
> * struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan
> * SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN
> * SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN(obj)
> * ...
>
>What do you think?
Sounds good. Will make adjustments.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
