On 9/1/15 12:39 PM, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
On Sep 1, 2015, at 11:25 AM, David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: for net-next. Forgot to add to subject line. (Thanks, Roopa, for the reminder.) On 9/1/15 12:18 PM, David Ahern wrote:A number of VRF patches used 'int' for table id. It should be u32 to be consistent with the rest of the stack. Fixes: 4e3c89920cd3a ("net: Introduce VRF related flags and helpers") 15be405eb2ea9 ("net: Add inet_addr lookup by table") 30bbaa1950055 ("net: Fix up inet_addr_type checks") 021dd3b8a142d ("net: Add routes to the table associated with the device") dc028da54ed35 ("inet: Move VRF table lookup to inlined function") Signed-off-by: David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> --- include/net/route.h | 2 +- include/net/vrf.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------ net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 2 +- net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c | 10 +++++----- net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)<<snip>> Should the fib_table_lookup tracepoint be updated as well ? It seems to be using int for tb_id even though it’s a u32 in struct fib_table.
yes. good catch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
