> On Sep 1, 2015, at 11:25 AM, David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>
> for net-next. Forgot to add to subject line. (Thanks, Roopa, for the
> reminder.)
>
> On 9/1/15 12:18 PM, David Ahern wrote:
>> A number of VRF patches used 'int' for table id. It should be u32 to be
>> consistent with the rest of the stack.
>>
>> Fixes:
>> 4e3c89920cd3a ("net: Introduce VRF related flags and helpers")
>> 15be405eb2ea9 ("net: Add inet_addr lookup by table")
>> 30bbaa1950055 ("net: Fix up inet_addr_type checks")
>> 021dd3b8a142d ("net: Add routes to the table associated with the device")
>> dc028da54ed35 ("inet: Move VRF table lookup to inlined function")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/route.h | 2 +-
>> include/net/vrf.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
>> net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 2 +-
>> net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c | 10 +++++-----
>> net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c | 2 +-
>> 5 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
<<snip>>
Should the fib_table_lookup tracepoint be updated as well ? It seems to be using
int for tb_id even though it’s a u32 in struct fib_table.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
