On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:27:22 +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki wrote: > > You're right generally. But this one should be okay and I did this > > deliberately: the patch adding LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_ILA was merged two days > > ago, is in net-next only, is not used by anything in user space yet. > > And I think it's better to have LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_IP and > > LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_IP6 without anything in between. > > I do think you should have some descriptions.
Sorry, I meant to put this into the description but forget to add it after the rebase on top of ILA (as the patchset conflicted with the ILA work and was developed in parallel). Are you okay with inserting LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_IP6 before LWTUNNEL_ENCAP_ILA? If so, I'll resend with the explanation added. Thanks, Jiri -- Jiri Benc -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
