On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote: > Hi, > > ----- On May 29, 2015, at 11:24 AM, Or Gerlitz gerlitz...@gmail.com wrote: > >> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Vivien Didelot >> <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote: >>> @@ -854,7 +922,9 @@ int dsa_slave_create(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct >>> device >>> *parent, >>> if (slave_dev == NULL) >>> return -ENOMEM; >>> >>> - slave_dev->features = master->vlan_features; >>> + slave_dev->features = master->vlan_features | >>> + NETIF_F_VLAN_FEATURES | >>> + NETIF_F_HW_SWITCH_OFFLOAD; >> >> wait... didn't commit 7889cbee8357aaed85898d028829dfb4f75bae2c remove >> NETIF_F_HW_SWITCH_OFFLOAD? > > Indeed, note that this RFC is based on v4.1-rc3. This will become unneeded I > guess.
You should rebase networking patches proposed for the next kernel against the net-next tree. > BTW, given the commit message, I didn't really understand why? M2, I thought it was unsuccessful commit message and made a comment to the maintainer, he didn't accept it. Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
