On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:36:45 +0100 Robert Olsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Stephen Hemminger writes: > > > Dumping by prefix is possible, but unless 32x slower. Dumping in > > address order is just as logical. Like I said, I'm investigating what > > quagga handles. > > How about taking a snapshot to in address order (as you did) to some > allocated memory, returning from that memory in prefix order? This would > solve the -EBUSY too and give a consistent view of the routing table at > the time for the dump/snapshot. > > Cheers > --ro Snapshotting is going to work, because of scale and because the kernel can't tell when application is going to come back. -- Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
