Stephen Hemminger writes:
> Dumping by prefix is possible, but unless 32x slower. Dumping in
> address order is just as logical. Like I said, I'm investigating what
> quagga handles.
How about taking a snapshot to in address order (as you did) to some
allocated memory, returning from that memory in prefix order? This would
solve the -EBUSY too and give a consistent view of the routing table at
the time for the dump/snapshot.
Cheers
--ro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
