On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ilpo,
> > 
> > > It's almost impossible to know which of these is the main cause and the
> > > first occuring due to reasons I'll not copy here. What a strange thing
> > > that it has been super quiet on this front until now everybody is seeing
> > > it, could there be something unrelated to TCP which has broken it all
> > > recently?
> > 
> > I have been getting this for atleast 3 weeks but I was quiet since those
> > were kernels that I had modified.
> 
> Since you can easily reproduce it, lets just figure out what's causing it 
> hard way, rather than digging the endless git-logs... :-)

Hmm, perhaps it could be something related to this (and some untested 
path somewhere which is now exposed):

commit 4a55b553f691abadaa63570dfc714e20913561c1
Author: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   Thu Dec 20 20:36:03 2007 -0800

    [TCP]: Fix TSO deferring

Dave, what do you think? Wouldn't explain the one -rc only report though 
from Denys. Another one I'm a bit unsure of is this:

commit 757c32944b80fd95542bd66f06032ab773034d53
Author: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:   Thu Jan 3 20:39:01 2008 -0800

    [TCP]: Perform setting of common control fields in one place

->sacked field is cleared in tcp_retransmit_skb due to a subtle change, 
which might be buggy.... However, I find it rather unlikely that this 
would explain Kumar's case. Anyway, here's the one that reverts the 
problematic part of it. ...and this is net-2.6.25 as well so it won't 
solve Denys' case either.

-- 
 i.

--
[PATCH] [TCP]: Revert part of "[TCP]: Perform setting of common control..."

This commit reverts part of 757c32944b80fd95542bd66f06032ab773034d53
([TCP]: Perform setting of common control fields in one place)
because it's not valid to clear ->sacked field like that without
additional precautions with counters, mostly lost_out, sacked_out
should not be set due to reneging which kicks in much earlier than
this.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_output.c |    8 +++++---
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index 648340f..f6cbc1f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -1887,10 +1887,12 @@ int tcp_retransmit_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff 
*skb)
            (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags & TCPCB_FLAG_FIN) &&
            tp->snd_una == (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - 1)) {
                if (!pskb_trim(skb, 0)) {
-                       /* Reuse, even though it does some unnecessary work */
-                       tcp_init_nondata_skb(skb, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - 1,
-                                            TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags);
+                       TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq - 1;
+                       skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs = 1;
+                       skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size = 0;
+                       skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type = 0;
                        skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
+                       skb->csum = 0;
                }
        }
 
-- 
1.5.2.2

Reply via email to