David Miller wrote: > From: Hideo AOKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:01:46 -0500 > >> diff -pruN net-2.6.25-t12t19m-p4/net/ipv4/proc.c >> net-2.6.25-t12t19m-p5/net/ipv4/proc.c >> --- net-2.6.25-t12t19m-p4/net/ipv4/proc.c 2007-12-27 10:19:02.000000000 >> -0500 >> +++ net-2.6.25-t12t19m-p5/net/ipv4/proc.c 2007-12-29 21:09:21.000000000 >> -0500 >> @@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ static int sockstat_seq_show(struct seq_ >> sock_prot_inuse(&tcp_prot), atomic_read(&tcp_orphan_count), >> tcp_death_row.tw_count, atomic_read(&tcp_sockets_allocated), >> atomic_read(&tcp_memory_allocated)); >> - seq_printf(seq, "UDP: inuse %d\n", sock_prot_inuse(&udp_prot)); >> + seq_printf(seq, "UDP: inuse %d mem %d\n", sock_prot_inuse(&udp_prot), >> + atomic_read(&udp_memory_allocated)); >> seq_printf(seq, "UDPLITE: inuse %d\n", sock_prot_inuse(&udplite_prot)); >> seq_printf(seq, "RAW: inuse %d\n", sock_prot_inuse(&raw_prot)); >> seq_printf(seq, "FRAG: inuse %d memory %d\n", > > More careless patch creation. :-/ > > This breaks the build because udp_memory_allocated is not added until > patch 2.
Hello David, You are absolutely right. > Once again I'll combine all three patches into one but I am extremely > angry about how careless and broken these two patch submissions were. I really apologize for wasting your time twice. I do not do this kind mess again. Many thanks for your support. Best regards, Hideo -- Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
