From: Hideo AOKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:01:46 -0500

> diff -pruN net-2.6.25-t12t19m-p4/net/ipv4/proc.c 
> net-2.6.25-t12t19m-p5/net/ipv4/proc.c
> --- net-2.6.25-t12t19m-p4/net/ipv4/proc.c     2007-12-27 10:19:02.000000000 
> -0500
> +++ net-2.6.25-t12t19m-p5/net/ipv4/proc.c     2007-12-29 21:09:21.000000000 
> -0500
> @@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ static int sockstat_seq_show(struct seq_
>                  sock_prot_inuse(&tcp_prot), atomic_read(&tcp_orphan_count),
>                  tcp_death_row.tw_count, atomic_read(&tcp_sockets_allocated),
>                  atomic_read(&tcp_memory_allocated));
> -     seq_printf(seq, "UDP: inuse %d\n", sock_prot_inuse(&udp_prot));
> +     seq_printf(seq, "UDP: inuse %d mem %d\n", sock_prot_inuse(&udp_prot),
> +                atomic_read(&udp_memory_allocated));
>       seq_printf(seq, "UDPLITE: inuse %d\n", sock_prot_inuse(&udplite_prot));
>       seq_printf(seq, "RAW: inuse %d\n", sock_prot_inuse(&raw_prot));
>       seq_printf(seq,  "FRAG: inuse %d memory %d\n",

More careless patch creation.  :-/

This breaks the build because udp_memory_allocated is not added until
patch 2.

Once again I'll combine all three patches into one but I am extremely
angry about how careless and broken these two patch submissions were.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to