On Wednesday 07 November 2007 01:13:14 John W. Linville wrote:
> "ssb: Fix initcall ordering" changes a subsys_initcall to an
> fs_initcall.  This seems like a bit of a hack, but it fixes a real
> problem and I'm not sure what cleaner solution is either reasonable
> or available.  The comment in the patch explains the reasoning for this
> somewhat unique situation.

Well, ssb is not the only subsystem with this special requirement.
Grep for fs_initcall. In my opinion we need another initcall to fix
this issue. I think we need a post_subsys_initcall().
But that really is another issue that we can't decide in netdev.
For now, this fix is harmless and fixes the bug.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to