On 9/6/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Andy Gospodarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:45:16 -0400 > > > Is is really necessary to get rid of the HT1000 patch? > > Yes, absolutely and without a single doubt. > > > commit e3008dedff4bdc96a5f67224cd3d8d12237082a0 > > Author: Andy Gospodarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu May 10 22:58:57 2007 -0700 > > > > PCI: disable MSI by default on systems with Serverworks HT1000 chips > > > > This patch was designed to address tg3 and bnx2 messages printed on > > systems with HT1000 chips IIRC. Are we going back to those messages on > > bnx2 or is there a workaround in that driver needed too? > > Every report of that problem is with tg3 chips afflicted by this > INTX bug which is now worked around properly. > > Even my Niagara T1000 box was hit by this absolutely stupid and > wrong MSI quirk, which is how I found this problem to begin with. > > I'm reverting it. >
Sounds great. I never liked it that much to begin with but no one NACKED it, so it slipped in through Greg KH's tree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
