On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:05:30PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 11:41 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:34:23AM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Andy Gospodarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 09:45:16 -0400 > > > > > > > Is is really necessary to get rid of the HT1000 patch? > > > > > > Yes, absolutely and without a single doubt. > > > > > > > commit e3008dedff4bdc96a5f67224cd3d8d12237082a0 > > > > Author: Andy Gospodarek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Date: Thu May 10 22:58:57 2007 -0700 > > > > > > > > PCI: disable MSI by default on systems with Serverworks HT1000 chips > > > > > > > > This patch was designed to address tg3 and bnx2 messages printed on > > > > systems with HT1000 chips IIRC. Are we going back to those messages on > > > > bnx2 or is there a workaround in that driver needed too? > > > > > > Every report of that problem is with tg3 chips afflicted by this > > > INTX bug which is now worked around properly. > > > > > > > Not according to this: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227657 > > > > Which was precisely why I chose to look at it as a chipset issue. > > The HT1000 bridge may very well have an MSI issue. I'm checking with > ServerWorks and I will do some testing to confirm. If confirmed, we can > disable MSI behind the HT1000 bridge instead of globally. The 5714 > issue is not caused by the HT1000 as it is not behind the HT1000. >
Thanks for checking that out. You can probably get the information more easily than I can. ;-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
