On 12/8/20 7:07 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:54:28 +0100 Oliver Hartkopp wrote: >> On 05.12.20 22:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>> On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 21:56:33 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >>>> On 12/5/20 9:33 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >>>>>> What about the (incremental?) change that Thomas Wagner posted? >>>>>> >>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] >>>>> >>>>> That settles it :) This change needs to got into -next and 5.11. >>>> >>>> Ok. Can you take patch 1, which is a real fix: >>>> >>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/[email protected]/ >>>> >>> >>> Sure! Applied that one from the ML (I assumed that's what you meant). >> >> I just double-checked this mail and in fact the second patch from Marc's >> pull request was a real fix too: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/[email protected]/ > > Ack, I thought it was a fix to some existing code but it's a fix to > ISO-TP so we should probably get it in before someone start depending > on existing behavior - Marc should I apply that one directly, too?
Yes, please take that patch directly. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
