On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 21:24:42 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 12/5/20 12:26 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> > On 05.12.20 04:44, Jakub Kicinski wrote:  
> >> On Fri,  4 Dec 2020 14:35:08 +0100 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:  
> >>> From: Oliver Hartkopp <socket...@hartkopp.net>
> >>>
> >>> When CAN_ISOTP_SF_BROADCAST is set in the CAN_ISOTP_OPTS flags the 
> >>> CAN_ISOTP
> >>> socket is switched into functional addressing mode, where only single 
> >>> frame
> >>> (SF) protocol data units can be send on the specified CAN interface and 
> >>> the
> >>> given tp.tx_id after bind().
> >>>
> >>> In opposite to normal and extended addressing this socket does not 
> >>> register a
> >>> CAN-ID for reception which would be needed for a 1-to-1 ISOTP connection 
> >>> with a
> >>> segmented bi-directional data transfer.
> >>>
> >>> Sending SFs on this socket is therefore a TX-only 'broadcast' operation.  
> >>
> >> Unclear from this patch what is getting fixed. Looks a little bit like
> >> a feature which could be added in a backward compatible way, no?
> >> Is it only added for completeness of the ISOTP implementation?
> >>  
> > 
> > Yes, the latter.
> > 
> > It's a very small and simple tested addition and I hope it can still go 
> > into the initial upstream process.  
> 
> What about the (incremental?) change that Thomas Wagner posted?
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201204135557.55599-1-th...@web.de

That settles it :) This change needs to got into -next and 5.11.

Reply via email to