On Sun, 18 Oct 2020 at 17:45, Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote: > > > However, that leaves the question why bbc4d71d63549bcd was backported, > > although I understand why the discussion is a bit trickier there. But > > if it did not fix a regression, only broken code that never worked in > > the first place, I am not convinced it belongs in -stable. > > Please ask Serge Semin what platform he tested on. I kind of expect it > worked for him, in some limited way, enough that it passed his > testing. >
I'll make a note here that a rather large number of platforms got broken by the same fix for the Realtek PHY driver: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/?q=bbc4d71d6354 I seriously doubt whether disabling TX/RX delay when it is enabled by h/w straps is the right thing to do here.
