(cc'ing some folks who may care about functional networking on SynQuacer) On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 21:49, Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote: > > > So we can fix this firmware by just setting phy-mode to the empty > > string, right? > > I've never actually tried it, but i think so. There are no DT files > actually doing that, so you really do need to test it and see. And > there might be some differences between device_get_phy_mode() and > of_get_phy_mode(). >
Yes, that works fine. Fixed now in the latest firmware build [0] But that still leaves the question whether and how to work around this for units in the field. Ignoring the PHY mode in the driver would help, as all known hardware ships with firmware that configures the PHY with the correct settings, but we will lose the ability to use other PHY modes in the future, in case the SoC is ever used with DT based minimal firmware that does not configure networking. Since ACPI implies rich firmware, we could make ACPI probing of the driver ignore the phy-mode setting in the DSDT. But if we don't do the same for DT, it would mean DT users are forced to upgrade their firmware, and hopefully do so before upgrading to a kernel that breaks networking. (These boxes are often used headless, so this can be annoying) [0] http://snapshots.linaro.org/components/kernel/leg-96boards-developerbox-edk2/83/