Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:48:56PM CEST, vladimir.olt...@nxp.com wrote: >On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:07:58PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 01:03:56PM CEST, vladimir.olt...@nxp.com wrote: >> >On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:46:14PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: >> >> That makes sense to me as it would be confusing to suddenly show unused >> >> port >> >> flavors after this patch series land. Andrew, Vladimir, does that work for >> >> you as well? >> > >> >I have nothing to object against somebody adding a '--all' argument to >> >devlink port commands. >> >> How "unused" is a "flavour"? It seems to me more like a separate >> attribute as port of any "flavour" may be potentially "unused". I don't >> think we should mix these 2. >> > >I guess it's you who suggested it might make sense to add an "unused" >port flavour?
Maybe, but that was just an idea. 2 years later, I don't think it is a good idea. > >> Okay. That looks fine. I wonder if it would make sense to have another >> flavour for "unused" ports. > >https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/cover/20180322105522.8186-1-j...@resnulli.us/ > >Thanks, >-Vladimir
