On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:07:58PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 01:03:56PM CEST, vladimir.olt...@nxp.com wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:46:14PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> That makes sense to me as it would be confusing to suddenly show unused > >> port > >> flavors after this patch series land. Andrew, Vladimir, does that work for > >> you as well? > > > >I have nothing to object against somebody adding a '--all' argument to > >devlink port commands. > > How "unused" is a "flavour"? It seems to me more like a separate > attribute as port of any "flavour" may be potentially "unused". I don't > think we should mix these 2. >
I guess it's you who suggested it might make sense to add an "unused" port flavour? > Okay. That looks fine. I wonder if it would make sense to have another > flavour for "unused" ports. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/cover/20180322105522.8186-1-j...@resnulli.us/ Thanks, -Vladimir
