On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 10:59 AM Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxi...@nvidia.com> wrote: > > On 2020-09-04 18:05, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 11:01 PM Saeed Mahameed <sae...@nvidia.com> wrote: > >> > >> From: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxi...@mellanox.com> > >> > >> A constant for the number of DS in an empty WQE (i.e. a WQE without data > >> segments) is needed in multiple places (normal TX data path, MPWQE in > >> XDP), but currently we have a constant for XDP and an inline formula in > >> normal TX. This patch introduces a common constant. > >> > >> Additionally, mlx5e_xdp_mpwqe_session_start is converted to use struct > >> assignment, because the code nearby is touched. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxi...@mellanox.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@nvidia.com> > >> --- > >> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/txrx.h | 2 ++ > >> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xdp.c | 13 +++++++----- > >> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/xdp.h | 21 +++++++------------ > >> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tx.c | 2 +- > >> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/txrx.h > >> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/txrx.h > >> index d4ee22789ab0..155b89998891 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/txrx.h > >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/txrx.h > >> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@ > >> #include "en.h" > >> #include <linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h> > >> > >> +#define MLX5E_TX_WQE_EMPTY_DS_COUNT (sizeof(struct mlx5e_tx_wqe) / > >> MLX5_SEND_WQE_DS) > >> + > > > > Out of curiosity, what is the logic for dividing this struct by 16? > > The hardware needs the size of a WQE in DS units (16 bytes). An empty > WQE takes 2 DS (for the ctrl and eth segments), and this macro is this > initial size of an empty WQE (2 DS). As data segments are added to the > WQE, it grows, and its size in DS also grows. > > > struct mlx5e_tx_wqe { > > struct mlx5_wqe_ctrl_seg ctrl; > > struct mlx5_wqe_eth_seg eth; > > struct mlx5_wqe_data_seg data[0]; > > };
Thanks. It was not obvious to me that the first two are the size as data_segs. But that actually is pretty logical. Ack.