Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On 3/27/07, Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> nf_nat_helper.c:mangle_content() could make use of this, but it
>> would need memmove. Something to do this with non-linear packets
>> would be even cooler :)
> 
> 
> Damn, that was so fast man! For the qeth case that motivated me to try
> the leftover it was like: memcpy is the fastest way, memmove would be
> more costly but more general, when in doubt I just droppped the users
> without removing the infrastructure, nah, lets leave this for another
> day, for now I'll just drop the non-used -new infrastrucure and
> resubmit.


Yes, as long as it doesn't help with anything else it doesn't seem
too useful. It did motivate me to try the non-linear skb mangling
though :)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to