On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:05:30 -0400 Jamie Gloudon <jamie.glou...@gmx.fr> wrote:
> While looking at the estimator code, I noticed an incorrect interval > number printed in raw for the handles. This patch fixes the formatting. > > Before patch: > > r...@bytecenter.fr:~# tc -r filter add dev eth0 ingress estimator > 250ms 999ms matchall action police avrate 12mbit conform-exceed drop > [estimator i=4294967294 e=2] > > After patch: > > r...@bytecenter.fr:~# tc -r filter add dev eth0 ingress estimator > 250ms 999ms matchall action police avrate 12mbit conform-exceed drop > [estimator i=-2 e=2] > > Signed-off-by: Jamie Gloudon <jamie.glou...@gmx.fr> > --- > tc/m_estimator.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tc/m_estimator.c b/tc/m_estimator.c > index ef62e1bb..b5f4c860 100644 > --- a/tc/m_estimator.c > +++ b/tc/m_estimator.c > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int parse_estimator(int *p_argc, char ***p_argv, struct > tc_estimator *est) > return -1; > } > if (show_raw) > - fprintf(stderr, "[estimator i=%u e=%u]\n", est->interval, > est->ewma_log); > + fprintf(stderr, "[estimator i=%hhd e=%u]\n", est->interval, > est->ewma_log); > *p_argc = argc; > *p_argv = argv; > return 0; > -- > 2.17.5 > Looks ok to me. Could you update estimator to print JSON as well?