On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 11:05:30 -0400
Jamie Gloudon <jamie.glou...@gmx.fr> wrote:

> While looking at the estimator code, I noticed an incorrect interval
> number printed in raw for the handles. This patch fixes the formatting.
> 
> Before patch:
> 
> r...@bytecenter.fr:~# tc -r filter add dev eth0 ingress estimator
> 250ms 999ms matchall action police avrate 12mbit conform-exceed drop
> [estimator i=4294967294 e=2]
> 
> After patch:
> 
> r...@bytecenter.fr:~# tc -r filter add dev eth0 ingress estimator
> 250ms 999ms matchall action police avrate 12mbit conform-exceed drop
> [estimator i=-2 e=2]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jamie Gloudon <jamie.glou...@gmx.fr>
> ---
>  tc/m_estimator.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tc/m_estimator.c b/tc/m_estimator.c
> index ef62e1bb..b5f4c860 100644
> --- a/tc/m_estimator.c
> +++ b/tc/m_estimator.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int parse_estimator(int *p_argc, char ***p_argv, struct 
> tc_estimator *est)
>               return -1;
>       }
>       if (show_raw)
> -             fprintf(stderr, "[estimator i=%u e=%u]\n", est->interval, 
> est->ewma_log);
> +             fprintf(stderr, "[estimator i=%hhd e=%u]\n", est->interval, 
> est->ewma_log);
>       *p_argc = argc;
>       *p_argv = argv;
>       return 0;
> --
> 2.17.5
> 

Looks ok to me. Could you update estimator to print JSON as well?

Reply via email to