While looking at the estimator code, I noticed an incorrect interval
number printed in raw for the handles. This patch fixes the formatting.

Before patch:

r...@bytecenter.fr:~# tc -r filter add dev eth0 ingress estimator
250ms 999ms matchall action police avrate 12mbit conform-exceed drop
[estimator i=4294967294 e=2]

After patch:

r...@bytecenter.fr:~# tc -r filter add dev eth0 ingress estimator
250ms 999ms matchall action police avrate 12mbit conform-exceed drop
[estimator i=-2 e=2]

Signed-off-by: Jamie Gloudon <jamie.glou...@gmx.fr>
---
 tc/m_estimator.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tc/m_estimator.c b/tc/m_estimator.c
index ef62e1bb..b5f4c860 100644
--- a/tc/m_estimator.c
+++ b/tc/m_estimator.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ int parse_estimator(int *p_argc, char ***p_argv, struct 
tc_estimator *est)
                return -1;
        }
        if (show_raw)
-               fprintf(stderr, "[estimator i=%u e=%u]\n", est->interval, 
est->ewma_log);
+               fprintf(stderr, "[estimator i=%hhd e=%u]\n", est->interval, 
est->ewma_log);
        *p_argc = argc;
        *p_argv = argv;
        return 0;
--
2.17.5

Reply via email to