Valerie Henson wrote:
Only print out debugging info for tulip_stop_rxtx if debug is on.
Many cards (including at least two of my own) fail to stop properly
during initialization according to this test with no apparent ill
effects.  Worse, it tends to spam logs when the driver doesn't work.

Signed-off-by: Val Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

---
 drivers/net/tulip/tulip.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- pristine-linux.orig/drivers/net/tulip/tulip.h
+++ pristine-linux/drivers/net/tulip/tulip.h
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static inline void tulip_stop_rxtx(struc
                while (--i && (ioread32(ioaddr + CSR5) & (CSR5_TS|CSR5_RS)))
                        udelay(10);
- if (!i)
+               if (!i && (tulip_debug > 1))
                        printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: tulip_stop_rxtx() failed"
                                        " (CSR5 0x%x CSR6 0x%x)\n",
                                        pci_name(tp->pdev),

Here's the problem with this: this printk is signalling that the DMA engines have not yet stopped, which is an event of which we should be wary.

While it makes sense to do this patch, since the complaining cards appear to work anyway, we also need to take into account the times when this is not a spurious warning.

Thus, I would consider maybe adding a warning somewhere in the DMA-engine-start region of code, that complains if the DMA engines are already active, or somesuch.

        Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to