On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 11:25:10AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Here's the problem with this: this printk is signalling that the DMA > engines have not yet stopped, which is an event of which we should be wary. > > While it makes sense to do this patch, since the complaining cards > appear to work anyway, we also need to take into account the times when > this is not a spurious warning. > > Thus, I would consider maybe adding a warning somewhere in the > DMA-engine-start region of code, that complains if the DMA engines are > already active, or somesuch.
Yeah, I agree it's signifying a problem, and we should have a warning (only one) until we figure out what's going on. Put on my to-do list. -VAL - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
