On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 at 17:58, Davide Caratti <dcara...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 17:23 +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > > (but again, this would be a fix for 'entries' - not for 'hitimer', so I > > > plan to work on it as a separate patch, that fits better 'net-next' rather > > > than 'net'). > > > > Targeting net-next would mean that the net tree would still keep > > appending to p->entries upon action replacement, instead of just > > replacing p->entries? > > well, this is the original act_gate behavior (and the bug is discovered > today, in this thread). But if users can't wait for the proper fix (and > equally important, for the tdc test file), I can think of sending the > patch directly for 'net'. > > -- > davide >
Well, it's up to you. Considering that your fixes here are for the 'tc action replace' case, I guess you might as well go all the way and make it work properly :) Cheers, -Vladimir
