On Tue, 2020-06-16 at 17:23 +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > (but again, this would be a fix for 'entries' - not for 'hitimer', so I > > plan to work on it as a separate patch, that fits better 'net-next' rather > > than 'net'). > > Targeting net-next would mean that the net tree would still keep > appending to p->entries upon action replacement, instead of just > replacing p->entries?
well, this is the original act_gate behavior (and the bug is discovered today, in this thread). But if users can't wait for the proper fix (and equally important, for the tdc test file), I can think of sending the patch directly for 'net'. -- davide
