On Wed 21 Aug 2019 at 01:32, Matthew Wilcox <wi...@infradead.org> wrote:
> From: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <wi...@infradead.org>
>
> Remove the hw_filter list in favour of using one of the XArray mark
> bits which lets us iterate more efficiently than walking a linked list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <wi...@infradead.org>
> ---
>  net/sched/cls_flower.c | 47 ++++++++++--------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_flower.c b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
> index 2a1999d2b507..4625de5e29a7 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
> @@ -85,11 +85,12 @@ struct fl_flow_tmplt {
>       struct tcf_chain *chain;
>  };
>
> +#define HW_FILTER    XA_MARK_1
> +
>  struct cls_fl_head {
>       struct rhashtable ht;
>       spinlock_t masks_lock; /* Protect masks list */
>       struct list_head masks;
> -     struct list_head hw_filters;
>       struct rcu_work rwork;
>       struct xarray filters;
>  };
> @@ -102,7 +103,6 @@ struct cls_fl_filter {
>       struct tcf_result res;
>       struct fl_flow_key key;
>       struct list_head list;
> -     struct list_head hw_list;
>       u32 handle;
>       u32 flags;
>       u32 in_hw_count;
> @@ -332,7 +332,6 @@ static int fl_init(struct tcf_proto *tp)
>
>       spin_lock_init(&head->masks_lock);
>       INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&head->masks);
> -     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&head->hw_filters);
>       rcu_assign_pointer(tp->root, head);
>       xa_init_flags(&head->filters, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC1);
>
> @@ -421,7 +420,6 @@ static void fl_hw_destroy_filter(struct tcf_proto *tp, 
> struct cls_fl_filter *f,
>
>       tc_setup_cb_call(block, TC_SETUP_CLSFLOWER, &cls_flower, false);
>       spin_lock(&tp->lock);
> -     list_del_init(&f->hw_list);
>       tcf_block_offload_dec(block, &f->flags);
>       spin_unlock(&tp->lock);
>
> @@ -433,7 +431,6 @@ static int fl_hw_replace_filter(struct tcf_proto *tp,
>                               struct cls_fl_filter *f, bool rtnl_held,
>                               struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>  {
> -     struct cls_fl_head *head = fl_head_dereference(tp);
>       struct tcf_block *block = tp->chain->block;
>       struct flow_cls_offload cls_flower = {};
>       bool skip_sw = tc_skip_sw(f->flags);
> @@ -485,9 +482,6 @@ static int fl_hw_replace_filter(struct tcf_proto *tp,
>               goto errout;
>       }
>
> -     spin_lock(&tp->lock);
> -     list_add(&f->hw_list, &head->hw_filters);
> -     spin_unlock(&tp->lock);
>  errout:
>       if (!rtnl_held)
>               rtnl_unlock();
> @@ -1581,7 +1575,6 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff 
> *in_skb,
>               err = -ENOBUFS;
>               goto errout_tb;
>       }
> -     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fnew->hw_list);
>       refcount_set(&fnew->refcnt, 1);
>
>       err = tcf_exts_init(&fnew->exts, net, TCA_FLOWER_ACT, 0);
> @@ -1698,6 +1691,11 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff 
> *in_skb,
>
>       *arg = fnew;
>
> +     if (!tc_skip_hw(fnew->flags))
> +             xa_set_mark(&head->filters, fnew->handle, HW_FILTER);
> +     else if (fold)
> +             xa_clear_mark(&head->filters, fnew->handle, HW_FILTER);
> +

I like how xa mark simplifies reoffload handling, but this wouldn't
work anymore because without rtnl protection fl_change()/fl_delete() can
be called concurrently with fl_reoffload(). My original implementation
of unlocked flower classifier relied on idr in fl_reoffload() and we had
to introduce hw_list due to following race conditions:

- fl_reoffload() can miss fnew if it runs after fnew was provisioned to
  hardware with fl_hw_replace_filter() but before it is marked with
  HW_FILTER.

- Another race condition would be in __fl_delete() when filter is
  removed from xarray, then shared block is detached concurrently which
  causes fl_reoffload() that misses the filter, then the block callback
  is no longer present when fl_hw_destroy_filter() calls
  tc_setup_cb_call() and we have a dangling filter that can't be removed
  from hardware anymore.

That is why filter must be added to hw_list where it is done now - in
fl_hw*() functions while holding rtnl lock to prevent concurrent
reoffload (block bind/unbind always take rtnl). I guess
marking/unmarking filters as HW_FILTER in exactly the same places where
it is inserted/removed from hw_list would also work.

>       kfree(tb);
>       tcf_queue_work(&mask->rwork, fl_uninit_mask_free_work);
>       return 0;
> @@ -1770,37 +1768,14 @@ static void fl_walk(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct 
> tcf_walker *arg,
>       arg->cookie = id;
>  }
>
> -static struct cls_fl_filter *
> -fl_get_next_hw_filter(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct cls_fl_filter *f, bool 
> add)
> -{
> -     struct cls_fl_head *head = fl_head_dereference(tp);
> -
> -     spin_lock(&tp->lock);
> -     if (list_empty(&head->hw_filters)) {
> -             spin_unlock(&tp->lock);
> -             return NULL;
> -     }
> -
> -     if (!f)
> -             f = list_entry(&head->hw_filters, struct cls_fl_filter,
> -                            hw_list);
> -     list_for_each_entry_continue(f, &head->hw_filters, hw_list) {
> -             if (!(add && f->deleted) && refcount_inc_not_zero(&f->refcnt)) {
> -                     spin_unlock(&tp->lock);
> -                     return f;
> -             }
> -     }
> -
> -     spin_unlock(&tp->lock);
> -     return NULL;
> -}
> -
>  static int fl_reoffload(struct tcf_proto *tp, bool add, flow_setup_cb_t *cb,
>                       void *cb_priv, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>  {
> +     struct cls_fl_head *head = fl_head_dereference(tp);
>       struct tcf_block *block = tp->chain->block;
>       struct flow_cls_offload cls_flower = {};
> -     struct cls_fl_filter *f = NULL;
> +     struct cls_fl_filter *f;
> +     unsigned long handle;
>       int err;
>
>       /* hw_filters list can only be changed by hw offload functions after
> @@ -1809,7 +1784,7 @@ static int fl_reoffload(struct tcf_proto *tp, bool add, 
> flow_setup_cb_t *cb,
>        */
>       ASSERT_RTNL();
>
> -     while ((f = fl_get_next_hw_filter(tp, f, add))) {
> +     xa_for_each_marked(&head->filters, handle, f, HW_FILTER) {
>               cls_flower.rule =
>                       flow_rule_alloc(tcf_exts_num_actions(&f->exts));
>               if (!cls_flower.rule) {

Reply via email to