On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 16:30:21 -0400, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats,
> > > tx_ktls_ooo_drop_no_sync_data) },
> > > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats,
> > > tx_ktls_ooo_drop_bypass_req) },
> > > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_ktls_ooo_dump_bytes)
> > > },
> > > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats,
> > > tx_ktls_ooo_dump_packets) },
> > > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_ktls_enc_packets) },
> > > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_ktls_enc_bytes) },
> > > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_ktls_ctx) },
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, rx_lro_packets) },
> >
> > Dave, please don't apply this, I will review in depth once I get
> > through the earlier 200 emails ;)
>
> Jakub can you please expedite ?
Sure thing! Looking now..
> Dave if it is ok with you i will re-spin and push a new pull request
> with mlx5-next dependencies + 2 Devlink fw version patches,
> and independently, i will post the TLS series for Jakub to review ?
