On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:12 PM Jakub Kicinski
<jakub.kicin...@netronome.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 18:16:15 +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_stats.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_stats.c
> > index 483d321d2151..6854f132d505 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_stats.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_stats.c
> > @@ -50,6 +50,15 @@ static const struct counter_desc sw_stats_desc[] = {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MLX5_EN_TLS
> > { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_tls_ooo) },
> > { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_tls_resync_bytes) },
> > +
> > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_ktls_ooo) },
>
> Why do you call this stat tx_ktls_ooo, and not tx_tls_ooo (extra 'k')?
>
> For nfp I used the stats' names from mlx5 FPGA to make sure we are all
> consistent. I've added them to the tls-offload.rst doc and Boris has
> reviewed it.
>
> * ``rx_tls_decrypted`` - number of successfully decrypted TLS segments
> * ``tx_tls_encrypted`` - number of in-order TLS segments passed to device
> for encryption
> * ``tx_tls_ooo`` - number of TX packets which were part of a TLS stream
> but did not arrive in the expected order
> * ``tx_tls_drop_no_sync_data`` - number of TX packets dropped because
> they arrived out of order and associated record could not be found
>
> Why can't you use the same names for the stats as you used for your mlx5
> FPGA?
>
Actually i agree here, I asked tariq to have FPGA TLS and new mlx5
embedded TLS mutually exclusive.
so there shouldn't be any reason to have new counter names for non FPGA tls.
> > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats,
> > tx_ktls_ooo_drop_no_sync_data) },
> > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats,
> > tx_ktls_ooo_drop_bypass_req) },
> > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_ktls_ooo_dump_bytes) },
> > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_ktls_ooo_dump_packets)
> > },
> > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_ktls_enc_packets) },
> > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_ktls_enc_bytes) },
> > + { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, tx_ktls_ctx) },
> > #endif
> >
> > { MLX5E_DECLARE_STAT(struct mlx5e_sw_stats, rx_lro_packets) },
>
> Dave, please don't apply this, I will review in depth once I get
> through the earlier 200 emails ;)
Jakub can you please expedite ?
Dave if it is ok with you i will re-spin and push a new pull request
with mlx5-next dependencies + 2 Devlink fw version patches,
and independently, i will post the TLS series for Jakub to review ?
