> On 1 Apr 2019, at 14:14, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:45:06PM +0000, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant > wrote: >> Hi Cong, >> >> OK, so I've renamed conndscp to conntrack and hopefully this are >> flexible enough for future conntrack->skb operations to be added in the >> future. How does this one fly? > > This work sort of clashes with the work that Paul Blakey and I are > doing to integrate conntrack with tc and vice-versa. > > Considering that in this patch the action is not RCU-ified, that it is > using a struct as netlink parameter and it is dealing only with the > dscp info, seems it's easier if we/you extend our code to support this > feature as well. How does that sound to you? > > The RFC I had posted is VERY outdated (message-id > cover.1548285996.git.mleit...@redhat.com), please don't use it as > reference. Not sure if Paul can post a refreshed RFC already. > > Thanks, > Marcelo
I think the reality is that I’m way out of my depth here. The idea was to have something so simple that I could write(copy - see act_connmark) it/use it for my use case. I looked at the email you suggested and have not a clue! Sorry. Maybe someone can see the idea and run with it. Kevin
