Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:45:06PM +0000, Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > Hi Cong, > > OK, so I've renamed conndscp to conntrack and hopefully this are > flexible enough for future conntrack->skb operations to be added in the > future. How does this one fly?
This work sort of clashes with the work that Paul Blakey and I are doing to integrate conntrack with tc and vice-versa. Considering that in this patch the action is not RCU-ified, that it is using a struct as netlink parameter and it is dealing only with the dscp info, seems it's easier if we/you extend our code to support this feature as well. How does that sound to you? The RFC I had posted is VERY outdated (message-id cover.1548285996.git.mleit...@redhat.com), please don't use it as reference. Not sure if Paul can post a refreshed RFC already. Thanks, Marcelo
