> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:06:45 +0800
> Zhiqiang Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From: "Suanming.Mou" <[email protected]>
>>
>> With ad6c9986bcb6, GRO cells will be destroyed in vxlan_uninit.
>
> Thanks for cleaning this up.
>
> I think it would be nice if you could actually explain in the commit
> message why this makes the call in vxlan_destroy_tunnels() redundant.
>
Thanks for your reply. Actually, the patch is a cleanup as you said.
In vxlan_destroy_tunnels func, unregister_netdevice_queue is called after
gro_cells_destroy
func. However, in unregister_netdevice_queue func, the gro_cells_destroy func
will also call
the gro_cells_destroy func as the following routine:
unregister_netdevice_many -> rollback_registered_many -> ndo_uninit ->
gro_cells_destroy
Fortunately, gro_cells_destroy func will check whether gcells->cells is NULL,
so even more than
one call gro_cells_destroy would not cause the memory twice-free problem.
>> Fixes: ad6c9986bcb6 ("vxlan: Fix GRO cells race condition between receive
>> and link delete")
>
> I'm not sure a Fixes: tag is appropriate here (and also if this
> shouldn't be targeted for net-next) -- in the end, gro_cells_destroy()
> there would just return:
>
> if (!gcells->cells)
> return;
>
>> Signed-off-by: Suanming.Mou <[email protected]>
As you said, this is just a cleanup. I will remove the Fixes tag in v2 patch.
I used the ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl to get the maintainers and mail-list,
and the return is
given as follows,
[root@localhost linux]# ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl
0001-vxlan-remove-the-redundant-gro_cells_destroy-calling.patch
"David S. Miller" <[email protected]> (odd fixer:NETWORKING
DRIVERS,commit_signer:57/57=100%)
Petr Machata <[email protected]>
(commit_signer:30/57=53%,authored:27/57=47%,added_lines:649/1160=56%,removed_lines:265/494=54%)
Ido Schimmel <[email protected]>
(commit_signer:15/57=26%,removed_lines:30/494=6%)
Roopa Prabhu <[email protected]>
(commit_signer:11/57=19%,authored:9/57=16%,added_lines:364/1160=31%,removed_lines:156/494=32%)
Sabrina Dubroca <[email protected]> (commit_signer:6/57=11%)
Stefano Brivio <[email protected]> (authored:5/57=9%,added_lines:63/1160=5%)
[email protected] (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
[email protected] (open list)
>
> Either way,
>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <[email protected]>
>