On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 2:29 PM David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > > From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 14:00:09 -0800 > > > Just to clarify, I have been suggesting to completely remove > > this unused macro, never suggest to just undefine it in-tree. > > > > There is no reason to keep it in-tree, whether defined or undefined, > > just for downstream users. > > And this is where you and I fundamentally disagree.
So you agree that I can add debugging printk's only for my own use? I can claim that I only use them downstream and you can't force me to carry local changes? If not, what is your criteria for accepting debugging printk's? Whose can be accepted and whose can't? Please be specific, and ideally make it a formal doc in netdev-FAQ.txt. Thanks!
