On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 04:35:02PM +0200, Gal Pressman wrote:
> > +/**> + * irdma_disassociate_ucontext - Disassociate user context> + *
> > @context: ib user context> + */> +static void
> > irdma_disassociate_ucontext(struct ib_ucontext *context)
> > +{
> > +}
>
> What's the motivation for a nop callback (over not implementing the
> function)?
This is my fault, I didn't finish yet and conver disassociate_ucontext
into a flags once they were all made empty.
> > + ret = irdma_alloc_rsrc(iwdev->rf,
> > + iwdev->rf->allocated_mrs, iwdev->rf->max_mr,
> > + &stag_index, &next_stag_index);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + stag = stag_index << IRDMA_CQPSQ_STAG_IDX_S;
> > + stag |= driver_key;
> > + stag += (u32)consumer_key;
> > + irdma_add_devusecount(iwdev);
> > + }
>
> This is confusing IMHO, better to test for 'if (ret)' and keep the main flow
> unindented.
Yes please follow the standard 'success oriented flow'
Jason