On 28.01.2019 21:22, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 08:30:10AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:09:51PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >>> Yes. All you have to do after each "git bisect good/bad" is build again, >>> test, and make current build as good or bad. >> >> Will report back if I get any results. When I bisected last time, I >> ended up with a kernel that didn't even boot, but with 5 steps this is >> probably manageable. Will take most of the week though. > > [3/4995]mh@fan:~/linux/git/linux ((6fcf9b1d4d6c...) *%|BISECTING) $ git bislog > git bisect start 'drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c' > # good: [4ff36466281428734791d3cc6331b8cca7c76019] r8169: replace > get_protocol with vlan_get_protocol > git bisect good 4ff36466281428734791d3cc6331b8cca7c76019 > # bad: [649f0837a8cc2b39329f2de00fa0d04b029291c5] r8169: fix broken > Wake-on-LAN from S5 (poweroff) > git bisect bad 649f0837a8cc2b39329f2de00fa0d04b029291c5 > # bad: [098b01ad9837b4d4d0022f407300f069a999e55a] r8169: don't include asm > headers directly > git bisect bad 098b01ad9837b4d4d0022f407300f069a999e55a > [4/4996]mh@fan:~/linux/git/linux ((6fcf9b1d4d6c...) *%|BISECTING) $ > > The kernel that I now have is 6fcf9b1d4d6cd38202247de5c0ac7d85c4483abb and > that one throws oopses on booting and won't suspend at all. > > Can I continue from here while still making sense? > Not w/o knowing whether this version is good or bad.
Because we're interested in file r8169.c only, you could test r8169.c from the oops-ing kernel on top of a working kernel version. > Greetings > Marc > Heiner