On Sat, 2019-01-12 at 12:45 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> "IPv6: " prefix is already added by pr_fmt, no need to include
> it again in the pr_warn() format.
[]
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
[]
> @@ -4256,7 +4256,7 @@ static void ip6_print_replace_route_err(struct
> list_head *rt6_nh_list)
> struct rt6_nh *nh;
>
> list_for_each_entry(nh, rt6_nh_list, next) {
> - pr_warn("IPV6: multipath route replace failed (check
> consistency of installed routes): %pI6c nexthop %pI6c ifi %d\n",
> + pr_warn("multipath route replace failed (check consistency of
> installed routes): %pI6c nexthop %pI6c ifi %d\n",
Thanks.
Just asking, couldn't this emit a rather long list?
Perhaps it should be ratelimited?
