On 2018/12/28 下午10:42, David Ahern wrote:
> On 12/27/18 2:38 AM, we...@ucloud.cn wrote:
>> From: wenxu <we...@ucloud.cn>
>>
>> In the ip_rcv the skb go through the PREROUTING hook first,
>> Then jump in vrf device go through the same hook again.
>> When conntrack work with vrf, there will be some conflict for rules.
>> Because the package go through the hook twice with different nf status
>>
>> ip link add user1 type vrf table 1
>> ip link add user2 type vrf table 2
>> ip l set dev tun1 master user1
>> ip l set dev tun2 master user2
>>
>> nft add table firewall
>> nft add chain firewall zones { type filter hook prerouting priority - 300
>> \; }
>> nft add rule firewall zones counter ct zone set iif map { "tun1" : 1, "tun2"
>> : 2 }
>> nft add chain firewall rule-1000-ingress
>> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-ingress ct zone 1 tcp dport 22 ct state new
>> counter accept
>> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-ingress counter drop
>> nft add chain firewall rule-1000-egress
>> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-egress tcp dport 22 ct state new counter drop
>> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-egress counter accept
>>
>> nft add chain firewall rules-all { type filter hook prerouting priority -
>> 150 \; }
>> nft add rule firewall rules-all ip daddr vmap { "2.2.2.11" : jump
>> rule-1000-ingress }
>> nft add rule firewall rules-all ct zone vmap { 1 : jump rule-1000-egress }
>>
>> nft add rule firewall dnat-all ct zone vmap { 1 : jump dnat-1000 }
>> nft add rule firewall dnat-1000 ip daddr 2.2.2.11 counter dnat to 10.0.0.7
>>
>> For a package with ip daddr 2.2.2.11 and tcp dport 22, first time accept in
>> the
>> rule-1000-ingress and dnat to 10.0.0.7. Then second time the packet goto the
>> wrong
>> chain rule-1000-egress which leads the packet drop
>>
>> So it proived a flag to control the vrf-device bypass go through hook for
>> the second time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: wenxu <we...@ucloud.cn>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/vrf.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>> include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 3 +++
>> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
> Thanks for the report with commands to reproduce. I am out of the office
> at the moment; I will take a look at this next week.
>
Hi,
How about the status of this patch? Should I resubmit it?
wenxu
