On 12/27/18 2:38 AM, we...@ucloud.cn wrote:
> From: wenxu <we...@ucloud.cn>
> 
> In the ip_rcv the skb go through the PREROUTING hook first,
> Then jump in vrf device go through the same hook again.
> When conntrack work with vrf, there will be some conflict for rules.
> Because the package go through the hook twice with different nf status
> 
> ip link add user1 type vrf table 1
> ip link add user2 type vrf table 2
> ip l set dev tun1 master user1
> ip l set dev tun2 master user2
> 
> nft add table firewall
> nft add chain firewall zones { type filter hook prerouting  priority - 300 \; 
> }
> nft add rule firewall zones counter ct zone set iif map { "tun1" : 1, "tun2" 
> : 2 }
> nft add chain firewall rule-1000-ingress
> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-ingress ct zone 1 tcp dport 22 ct state new 
> counter accept
> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-ingress counter drop
> nft add chain firewall rule-1000-egress
> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-egress tcp dport 22 ct state new counter drop
> nft add rule firewall rule-1000-egress counter accept
> 
> nft add chain firewall rules-all { type filter hook prerouting priority - 150 
> \; }
> nft add rule firewall rules-all ip daddr vmap { "2.2.2.11" : jump 
> rule-1000-ingress }
> nft add rule firewall rules-all ct zone vmap { 1 : jump rule-1000-egress }
> 
> nft add rule firewall dnat-all ct zone vmap { 1 : jump dnat-1000 }
> nft add rule firewall dnat-1000 ip daddr 2.2.2.11 counter dnat to 10.0.0.7
> 
> For a package with ip daddr 2.2.2.11 and tcp dport 22, first time accept in 
> the 
> rule-1000-ingress and dnat to 10.0.0.7. Then second time the packet goto the 
> wrong 
> chain rule-1000-egress which leads the packet drop
> 
> So it proived a flag to control the vrf-device bypass go through hook for 
> the second time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: wenxu <we...@ucloud.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/net/vrf.c            | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/uapi/linux/if_link.h |  3 +++
>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Thanks for the report with commands to reproduce. I am out of the office
at the moment; I will take a look at this next week.

Reply via email to