Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 03:48:50PM CET, pa...@netfilter.org wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 02:57:05PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 01:15:12AM CET, pa...@netfilter.org wrote:
>[...]
>> >diff --git a/include/net/pkt_cls.h b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
>> >index 7d7aefa5fcd2..7f9a8d5ca945 100644
>> >--- a/include/net/pkt_cls.h
>> >+++ b/include/net/pkt_cls.h
>> >@@ -758,6 +758,12 @@ enum tc_fl_command {
>> > TC_CLSFLOWER_TMPLT_DESTROY,
>> > };
>> >
>> >+struct tc_cls_flower_stats {
>> >+ u64 pkts;
>> >+ u64 bytes;
>> >+ u64 lastused;
>> >+};
>> >+
>> > struct tc_cls_flower_offload {
>> > struct tc_cls_common_offload common;
>> > enum tc_fl_command command;
>> >@@ -765,6 +771,7 @@ struct tc_cls_flower_offload {
>> > struct flow_rule rule;
>> > struct tcf_exts *exts;
>> > u32 classid;
>> >+ struct tc_cls_flower_stats stats;
>> > };
>> >
>> > static inline struct flow_rule *
>> >@@ -773,6 +780,14 @@ tc_cls_flower_offload_flow_rule(struct
>> >tc_cls_flower_offload *tc_flow_cmd)
>> > return &tc_flow_cmd->rule;
>> > }
>> >
>> >+static inline void tc_cls_flower_stats_update(struct tc_cls_flower_offload
>> >*cls_flower,
>> >+ u64 pkts, u64 bytes, u64 lastused)
>> >+{
>> >+ cls_flower->stats.pkts = pkts;
>> >+ cls_flower->stats.bytes = bytes;
>> >+ cls_flower->stats.lastused = lastused;
>>
>> Why do you need to store the values here in struct tc_cls_flower_offload?
>> Why don't you just call tcf_exts_stats_update()? Basically,
>> tc_cls_flower_stats_update() should be just wrapper around
>> tcf_exts_stats_update() so that drivers wouldn't use ->exts directly, as
>> you will remove them in follow-up patches, no?
>
>Patch 07/12 stops exposing tc action exts to drivers, so we need a
>structure (struct tc_cls_flower_stats) to convey this statistics back
>to the cls_flower frontend.
Hmm, shouldn't these stats be rather flow_rule related than flower
related?
