On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:11:06 +0300 Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> wrote:
> +int br_vlan_pvid_rtnl(const struct net_device *dev, u16 *p_pvid) > +{ > + struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg; > + > + ASSERT_RTNL(); > + if (netif_is_bridge_master(dev)) > + vg = br_vlan_group(netdev_priv(dev)); > + else > + return -EINVAL; > + > + *p_pvid = br_get_pvid(vg); > + return 0; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(br_vlan_pvid_rtnl); Unless there is a RCU version, no need for _rtnl suffix. Minor style issue, why not make error then go on and return -1 on error. int br_vlan_pvid(const struct net_device *dev) { const struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg; ASSERT_RTNL(); if (!netif_is_bridge_master(dev)) return -1; vg = br_vlan_group(netdev_priv(dev)); return br_get_pvid(vg); }