On Fri, 27 Apr 2018 18:11:06 +0300
Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> wrote:

> +int br_vlan_pvid_rtnl(const struct net_device *dev, u16 *p_pvid)
> +{
> +     struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;
> +
> +     ASSERT_RTNL();
> +     if (netif_is_bridge_master(dev))
> +             vg = br_vlan_group(netdev_priv(dev));
> +     else
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     *p_pvid = br_get_pvid(vg);
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(br_vlan_pvid_rtnl);


Unless there is a RCU version, no need for _rtnl suffix.

Minor style issue, why not make error then go on and return -1 on error.



int br_vlan_pvid(const struct net_device *dev)
{
        const struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;

        ASSERT_RTNL();

        if (!netif_is_bridge_master(dev))
                return -1;

        vg = br_vlan_group(netdev_priv(dev));
        return br_get_pvid(vg);
}

Reply via email to