On 3/27/18 7:42 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:18:24 -0400 (EDT)
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com> wrote:
----- On Mar 27, 2018, at 10:07 AM, rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
On Mon, 26 Mar 2018 19:47:02 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov <a...@fb.com> wrote:
From: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
introduce kernel_tracepoint_find_by_name() helper to let bpf core
find tracepoint by name and later attach bpf probe to a tracepoint
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rost...@goodmis.org>
Steven showed preference for tracepoint_kernel_find_by_name() at some
point (starting with a tracepoint_ prefix). I'm find with either of
the names.
Yeah, I do prefer tracepoint_kernel_find_by_name() to stay consistent
with the other tracepoint functions. But we have
"for_each_kernel_tracepoint()" and not "for_each_tracepoint_kernel()",
thus we need to pick being consistent with one or the other. One answer
is to use tracpoint_kernel_find_by_name() and rename the for_each to
for_each_tracpoint_kernel().
yep. that's exactly the reason I picked kernel_tracepoint_find_by_name()
to match for_each_kernel_tracepoint() naming.
I can certainly send a follow up patch to rename both to
*tracepoint_kernel* and then you can nack it because it breaks lttng :)
but let's do it in a separate thread.
Daniel,
do you mind adding { } as Steven requested while applying or
you want me to resubmit the whole thing?
Thanks!
