On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:31:02AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 3/24/18 8:31 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 08:36:20PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> >> @@ -405,18 +383,9 @@ static void ip6_dst_destroy(struct dst_entry *dst)
> >> rt->rt6i_idev = NULL;
> >> in6_dev_put(idev);
> >> }
> >> - bucket = rcu_dereference_protected(rt->rt6i_exception_bucket, 1);
> >> - if (bucket) {
> >> - rt->rt6i_exception_bucket = NULL;
> >> - kfree(bucket);
> >> - }
> >> -
> >> - m = rt->fib6_metrics;
> >> - if (m != &dst_default_metrics && refcount_dec_and_test(&m->refcnt))
> >> - kfree(m);
> >
> > You remove this...
> >
> >>
> >> rt->from = NULL;
> >> - dst_release(&from->dst);
> >> + fib6_info_release(from);
> >
> > Yet fib6_info_release() doesn't take care of it (unlike the IPv4
> > equivalent), which means you're leaking the metrics.
> >
> >> }
>
> ok, I'll take a look. I thought I verified both paths (fib6_info and
> dst) were freeing the metrics.
I get this from kmemleak (applied your patchset on top of fe2d55d295cf):
unreferenced object 0xffff88004e2c16c8 (size 96):
comm "systemd-network", pid 1255, jiffies 4295166424 (age 957.858s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
backtrace:
ip6_route_info_create (/net/ipv6/route.c:2849)
ip6_route_add (/net/ipv6/route.c:2975)
inet6_rtm_newroute (/net/ipv6/route.c:4357)
rtnetlink_rcv_msg (/net/core/rtnetlink.c:4643)
netlink_rcv_skb (/net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2445)
netlink_unicast (/net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1309 /net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1334)
netlink_sendmsg (/net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1897)
sock_sendmsg (/net/socket.c:630 /net/socket.c:639)
SYSC_sendto (/net/socket.c:1748)
do_syscall_64 (/arch/x86/entry/common.c:287)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:239)
0xffffffffffffffff (/./include/asm-generic/sections.h:42)
