[PATCH net-next 03/12] ptr_ring: READ/WRITE_ONCE for __ptr_ring_empty

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

Lockless __ptr_ring_empty requires that consumer head is read and
written at once, atomically. Annotate accordingly to make sure compiler
does it correctly.  Switch locked callers to __ptr_ring_peek which does
not support the lockless operation.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/ptr_ring.h | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
index 8594c7b..9a72d8f 100644
--- a/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptr_ring.h
@@ -196,7 +196,9 @@ static inline void *__ptr_ring_peek(struct ptr_ring *r)
  */
 static inline bool __ptr_ring_empty(struct ptr_ring *r)
 {
-       return !__ptr_ring_peek(r);
+       if (likely(r->size))
+               return !r->queue[READ_ONCE(r->consumer_head)];
+       return true;
 }
 
 static inline bool ptr_ring_empty(struct ptr_ring *r)
@@ -285,7 +287,8 @@ static inline void __ptr_ring_discard_one(struct ptr_ring 
*r)
                consumer_head = 0;
                r->consumer_tail = 0;
        }
-       r->consumer_head = consumer_head;
+       /* matching READ_ONCE in __ptr_ring_empty for lockless tests */
+       WRITE_ONCE(r->consumer_head, consumer_head);
 }
 
 static inline void *__ptr_ring_consume(struct ptr_ring *r)
@@ -541,7 +544,9 @@ static inline void ptr_ring_unconsume(struct ptr_ring *r, 
void **batch, int n,
                        goto done;
                }
                r->queue[head] = batch[--n];
-               r->consumer_tail = r->consumer_head = head;
+               r->consumer_tail = head;
+               /* matching READ_ONCE in __ptr_ring_empty for lockless tests */
+               WRITE_ONCE(r->consumer_head, head);
        }
 
 done:
-- 
MST