On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 12 December 2017 at 17:15,  <jassisinghb...@gmail.com> wrote:
....
>> +
>> +static int netsec_netdev_load_microcode(struct netsec_priv *priv)
>> +{
>> +       int err;
>> +
>> +       err = netsec_netdev_load_ucode_region(
>> +               priv, NETSEC_REG_DMAC_HM_CMD_BUF,
>> +               le32_to_cpup(priv->eeprom_base + 
>> NETSEC_EEPROM_HM_ME_ADDRESS_H),
>> +               le32_to_cpup(priv->eeprom_base + 
>> NETSEC_EEPROM_HM_ME_ADDRESS_L),
>> +               le32_to_cpup(priv->eeprom_base + NETSEC_EEPROM_HM_ME_SIZE));
>
> ... here, and in other places below, you are still dereferencing
> eeprom_base as if it is a pointer, which is not allowed with in the
> __iomem address space. This should use readl() instead [which happens
> to incorporate the endian swap as well]
>
Ahh, how could it have been just two revisions!

thanks

Reply via email to