Hi Florian, Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> writes:
>> @@ -72,11 +72,10 @@ static struct sk_buff *lan9303_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, >> struct net_device *dev, >> { >> u16 *lan9303_tag; >> struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = dev->dsa_ptr; >> - struct dsa_switch *ds; >> + struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dst->cpu_dp; >> + struct dsa_switch *ds = cpu_dp->ds; >> unsigned int source_port; >> >> - ds = dst->ds[0]; >> - >> if (unlikely(!ds)) { >> dev_warn_ratelimited(&dev->dev, "Dropping packet, due to >> missing DSA switch device\n"); >> return NULL; > > Similarly to the patch before, you can probably drop this test, I don't > actually see how we could trigger it. Good catch, I'll respin after eventually more reviews. Thanks, Vivien