Hi Florian,

Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> writes:

>> @@ -72,11 +72,10 @@ static struct sk_buff *lan9303_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, 
>> struct net_device *dev,
>>  {
>>      u16 *lan9303_tag;
>>      struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = dev->dsa_ptr;
>> -    struct dsa_switch *ds;
>> +    struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dst->cpu_dp;
>> +    struct dsa_switch *ds = cpu_dp->ds;
>>      unsigned int source_port;
>>  
>> -    ds = dst->ds[0];
>> -
>>      if (unlikely(!ds)) {
>>              dev_warn_ratelimited(&dev->dev, "Dropping packet, due to 
>> missing DSA switch device\n");
>>              return NULL;
>
> Similarly to the patch before, you can probably drop this test, I don't
> actually see how we could trigger it.

Good catch, I'll respin after eventually more reviews.


Thanks,

        Vivien

Reply via email to