On 09/29/2017 11:36 AM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> In a single-chip switch fabric, there is no need to fetch the dsa_switch
> structure from the tree, directly use the CPU port's "ds" member.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
> net/dsa/tag_lan9303.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_lan9303.c b/net/dsa/tag_lan9303.c
> index 0b9826105e42..f0b51acf36ac 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/tag_lan9303.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/tag_lan9303.c
> @@ -72,11 +72,10 @@ static struct sk_buff *lan9303_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct net_device *dev,
> {
> u16 *lan9303_tag;
> struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = dev->dsa_ptr;
> - struct dsa_switch *ds;
> + struct dsa_port *cpu_dp = dst->cpu_dp;
> + struct dsa_switch *ds = cpu_dp->ds;
> unsigned int source_port;
>
> - ds = dst->ds[0];
> -
> if (unlikely(!ds)) {
> dev_warn_ratelimited(&dev->dev, "Dropping packet, due to
> missing DSA switch device\n");
> return NULL;
Similarly to the patch before, you can probably drop this test, I don't
actually see how we could trigger it.
--
Florian
