On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:34:09PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> From: Yotam Gigi <[email protected]>
>
> Similarly to the offload_fwd_mark field, the offload_mr_fwd_mark field is
> used to allow partial offloading of MFC multicast routes.
> The reason why the already existing "offload_fwd_mark" bit cannot be used
> is that a switchdev driver would want to make the distinction between a
> packet that has already gone through L2 forwarding but did not go through
> multicast forwarding, and a packet that has already gone through both L2
> and multicast forwarding.
Hi Jiri
So we are talking about l2 vs l3. So why not call this
offload_l3_fwd_mark?
Is there anything really specific to multicast here?
Thanks
Andrew