On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:34:09PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > From: Yotam Gigi <yot...@mellanox.com> > > Similarly to the offload_fwd_mark field, the offload_mr_fwd_mark field is > used to allow partial offloading of MFC multicast routes.
> The reason why the already existing "offload_fwd_mark" bit cannot be used > is that a switchdev driver would want to make the distinction between a > packet that has already gone through L2 forwarding but did not go through > multicast forwarding, and a packet that has already gone through both L2 > and multicast forwarding. Hi Jiri So we are talking about l2 vs l3. So why not call this offload_l3_fwd_mark? Is there anything really specific to multicast here? Thanks Andrew